Comments on: A Paradigm Shift in Semantic Web Deployment? http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007 Project Management, Systems Analysis, Semantic Web, SEO, and Whatever Else... Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:15:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Louie Lou http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-205 Louie Lou Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:11:27 +0000 http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-205 Fantastic summation, though a bit disjointed, no? ;) Fantastic summation, though a bit disjointed, no? ;)

]]> By: Josh http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-203 Josh Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:34:32 +0000 http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-203 <p>Thanks for the comment, David. I will read up on hakia.com this afternoon. </p> <p>OWL is what provides the semantics to RDF; OWL provides the sets of rules that turn RDF into something meaningful. I guess it can be viewed as a superset of RDF, but it is more of a layer on top of RDF. (Imagine the OSI model) I didn't mention it because it is not the problem right now in deploying a Semantic Web. We need Developers and/or Companies to embrace RDF schema first. Maybe the diagram I added to the end of the blog post will help obviate things... OWL Full would involve the 3 layers on top of RDF, including Logic. </p> <p>Best,</p> <p>Josh</p> Thanks for the comment, David. I will read up on hakia.com this afternoon.

OWL is what provides the semantics to RDF; OWL provides the sets of rules that turn RDF into something meaningful. I guess it can be viewed as a superset of RDF, but it is more of a layer on top of RDF. (Imagine the OSI model) I didn’t mention it because it is not the problem right now in deploying a Semantic Web. We need Developers and/or Companies to embrace RDF schema first. Maybe the diagram I added to the end of the blog post will help obviate things… OWL Full would involve the 3 layers on top of RDF, including Logic.

Best,

Josh

]]> By: David Jensen http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-202 David Jensen Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:23:30 +0000 http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-202 OWL (Web Ontology Language) is, I think, a superset of RDF. Why did you not mention it? It is very odd that web sites have not done what you said. I saw a presentation for hakia.com, by the way, which does use linguistic analysis much more thoroughly than other search engines. However, the user interface is still a google box. OWL (Web Ontology Language) is, I think, a superset of RDF. Why did you not mention it? It is very odd that web sites have not done what you said. I saw a presentation for hakia.com, by the way, which does use linguistic analysis much more thoroughly than other search engines. However, the user interface is still a google box.

]]> By: frog.on.log http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-196 frog.on.log Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:37:23 +0000 http://mittechnical.com/BOSTON-SEO-WORDPRESS/a-paradigm-in-semantic-web-deployment/2007#comment-196 You pose interesting question here. My only question is why would any one play dumb? What is the advantage to business if they do? You pose interesting question here. My only question is why would any one play dumb? What is the advantage to business if they do?

]]>